RacerD is a static race detector that has been proven to be effective in engineering practice: it has seen thousands of data races fixed by developers before reaching production, and has supported the migration of Facebook’s Android app from a single-threaded to a multi-threaded architecture. We prove a True Positives Theorem stating that under certain assumptions, which reflect the way that product code (but not infrastructure code) uses concurrency, an idealized theoretical version of the analysis never reports a false positive. We also provide an empirical evaluation of an implementation of this analysis, versus the original RacerD.
The theorem was motivated in the first case by the desire to understand the observation from production that RacerD was providing remarkably accurate signal to developers, and then the theorem guided further analyzer design decisions. Technically, our result can be seen as saying that the analysis computes an under-approximation of an over-approximation, which is the reverse of the more usual (over of under) situation in static analysis. We suggest that theorems of this variety might be generally useful in designing static analyses for bug catching.